That civil forfeiture is important in stopping crime

LukeAVR (PRO)
0 points

ManateeInferno (CON)
WINNER!
5 points

Debate
Comments (1)
Rules
Judging (3)

LukeAVR (PRO)
Round Forfeited

Return To Top | Posted:

2017-04-29 00:42:01

ManateeInferno (CON)
Round Forfeited

Return To Top | Posted:

2017-05-01 00:42:03

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment

sir king debate
Unfortunately, neither contestants were actually able to carry out the debate. If anybody would like to debate this topic with me, then you are always allowed to contact me.

Posted 2017-05-08 15:44:25

The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2017-05-08 15:43:16

Judge: sir king debate
Win awarded to: ManateeInferno
Reasoning:
For moral reasons, the Negation must win this debate. The morality behind my vote is that the Affirmative was unable to actually BEGIN the debate, which becomes morally incorrect. If one chooses to participate in a debate, then the Affirmative burden is to actually present the first argument and introduce us to the debate. Regardless of the fact that both sides did not debate, there can be excuse to why the Negation forfeited and that is because the Affirmation never started the debate.

1 user rated this judgement as exceptional

0 comments on this judgement

2017-05-12 10:58:49

Judge: admin TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: ManateeInferno

2017-05-14 13:33:31

Judge: AlecHolbeck
Win awarded to: ManateeInferno

Rules of the debate

Video debate
Individual debate
4 rounds
7 minutes per round
No reply speeches
No cross-examination
Permissive Judging Standard (notes)
Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
Rated debate
Time to post: 2 days
Time to vote: 2 weeks
Time to prepare: 12 hours

This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29