Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!
The judging period on this debate is over
Previous Judgments
There are no judgements yet on this debate.
Rules of the debate
- Text debate
- Individual debate
- 2 rounds
- 8000 characters per round
- No reply speeches
- Uses cross-examination
- Community Judging Standard (notes)
- Forfeiting rounds means forfeiting the debate
- Images allowed
- HTML formatting allowed
- Rated debate
- Time to post: 1 day
- Time to vote: 3 days
- Time to prepare: None
- Time for cross-examination: 1 day
"Censorhip reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself." Symbols, words, images, these things all stand for ideas. If you ban then, you ban ideas, which is fucked up. I'm assuming that anyone on a debate site would agree that the censoring of ideas, no matter how scary, is outright wrong and silly, and a productive society must not shy away from the taboo. The only thing you get to censor from the public is something that is directly inciting violence. Yelling fire in a crowded room will cause dangerous mayhem for no reason. Any other speech is fair game, including films depicting rape, signs saying "No dogs or Mexicans Allowed," or an Ancient symbol the Third Reich used.
Even if you wanted to censor a symbol, why would it be the Nazi one? If you're gonna pick something to ban, why not make it the North Korean flag?
Posted 2017-04-01 09:51:59