Rules of the debate
- Text debate
- Individual debate
- 3 rounds
- 8000 characters per round
- No reply speeches
- No cross-examination
- Community Judging Standard (notes)
- Forfeiting rounds means forfeiting the debate
- Images allowed
- HTML formatting allowed
- Rated debate
- Time to post: 5 days
- Time to vote: 1 week
- Time to prepare: None
I will establish a system of world governing that will function without collapse, Con is to prove that the government system I introduce would fail and collapse within a short period of time.
No other systems of governing may be proposed by either side, the point is to argue whether Pro's system of government (whether made by himself, already made, etc) will function without fail.
by definition, 'A world government is a hypothetical entity consisting of a single or series of levels of government with authority encompassing the entire planet.
govern: conduct the policy, actions, and affairs of (a state, organization, or people).
The Iron Minister (PRO)
Come on, pro.Posted 2015-05-12 17:26:03
So? A world federation sounds like a legitimate argumentPosted 2015-05-07 12:45:04
The way pro has set it up, pro can argue any kind of global governance system, whether by federation or otherwise.Posted 2015-05-07 10:36:08
You mean a Federal global government?Posted 2015-05-07 10:08:02